Mr. Ingrassia persuaded the appellate court that the evidence at trial was only sufficient to support a conviction for DWAI (Driving While Ability Impaired by alcohol) and not DWI. As a result his client’s criminal conviction was reversed.
Mr. Ingrassia persuaded the appellate court that the evidence at trial was only sufficient to support a conviction for DWAI (Driving While Ability Impaired by alcohol) and not DWI. As a result his client’s criminal conviction was reversed.